ABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Embora crescente a incidência de alergia ao látex na população em geral, eventos graves de anafilaxia durante alguns procedimentos cirúrgicos felizmente ainda são raros, porém com morbidade e mortalidade elevados. Não apenas a prevenção, mas o diagnóstico, o pronto tratamento e o acompanhamento dos pacientes acometidos por esse evento representam um desafio para o anestesiologista. O presente relato teve por objetivo descrever um caso de anafilaxia grave ao látex e discutir seu diagnóstico e tratamento. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 39 anos, branca com suspeita diagnóstica de apendicite, é levada para procedimento de urgência sob raquianestesia. Aproximadamente 30 minutos após o início da cirurgia, apresentou quadro de anafilaxia com parada cardiorrespiratória, revertida após tratamento. Um dos cuidados foi o isolamento de eventuais agentes causais, sendo que, posteriormente, a paciente foi encaminhada para unidade de terapia intensiva e evoluiu sem sequelas. A dosagem de IgE-RAST (Radioallergosorbent Test) específico para o látex mostrou-se positiva. A paciente foi encaminhada para acompanhamento com o alergologista. CONCLUSÕES: O anestesiologista deve concentrar esforços na anamnese, mesmo em procedimentos de urgência, estando consciente das limitações que se apresentam nessas ocasiões. O prognóstico de anafilaxia depende do pronto início do tratamento adequado e o diagnóstico não se limita ao momento do evento, mas sim à determinação do fator causal. Criar um meio de acompanhar esses pacientes, a exemplo de outros centros internacionais, parece ser o caminho a ser seguido.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite the increase of latex allergy in general population, severe anaphylactic events during some surgical procedures are still rare; however, they are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients affected by this event represent a challenge for anesthesiologists. The objective of this report was to describe a case of severe latex-induced anaphylactic reaction and discuss its diagnosis and treatment. CASE REPORT: This is a 39-year-old Caucasian female patient, with a diagnostic suspicion of appendicitis, who underwent an emergency surgery under spinal anesthesia. Approximately 30 minutes after beginning the surgery, the patient developed an anaphylactic reaction with cardiorespiratory arrest, which was reversed after treatment. Possible causative agents were isolated and, posteriorly, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit, evolving without sequelae. Latex-specific IgE-RAST (Radioallergosorbent Test) was positive. The patient was referred to an allergist for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists should focus on patient's history, even in urgent procedures, being aware of the limitations arising on these situations. The prognosis of anaphylaxis depends on prompt initiation of adequate treatment; diagnosis is not limited to the event occasion, but to the determination of the causative factor. Creating the means of following-up these patients, similar to other international centers, seems to be the example to be followed.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Aunque exista un aumento en la incidencia de alergia al látex en la población en general, los eventos graves de anafilaxia durante algunos procedimientos quirúrgicos por suerte todavía son raros, aunque con un nivel de morbilidad y mortalidad elevados. La prevención, el diagnóstico, el rápido tratamiento y el seguimiento de los pacientes afectados por ese evento, representan un reto para el anestesiólogo. El presente relato intentó describir un caso de anafilaxia grave al látex y discutir su diagnóstico y tratamiento. RELATO DEL CASO: Paciente del sexo femenino, 39 anos, blanca y con sospecha diagnóstica de apendicitis, que fue derivada a quirófano para un procedimiento urgente bajo raquianestesia. Aproximadamente 30 minutos después del inicio de la cirugía, presentó un cuadro de anafilaxia con parada cardiorrespiratoria, revertida posteriormente al tratamiento. Uno de los cuidados tomados fue el aislamiento de eventuales agentes causales, siendo que, posteriormente, la paciente fue derivada a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y evolucionó sin secuelas. La dosificación de IgE-RAST (Radioallergosorbent Test), específico para el látex fue positiva. La paciente fue derivada para seguimiento con el alergista. CONCLUSIONES: El anestesiólogo debe concentrar sus esfuerzos en la anamnesis, aunque en los procedimientos de urgencia, sea consciente de las limitaciones que se presentan en esas ocasiones. El pronóstico de anafilaxia depende del rápido inicio del tratamiento adecuado, y el diagnóstico no se restringe al momento del evento, sino a la determinación del factor causal. Crear un medio de seguimiento para esos pacientes, como lo hacen otros centros internacionales, parece ser el camino que debe ser secundado.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Appendectomy , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Intraoperative Complications/chemically induced , Intraoperative Complications/immunology , Latex Hypersensitivity/chemically inducedABSTRACT
As proteínas do leite de vaca são os principais alérgenos relacionados à alergia alimentar em crianças e o diagnóstico inclui a realização do teste de provocação oral duplo cego placebo controlado (TPODCPC). Apesar da acurácia, este teste envolve riscos, necessita condições especiais para sua realização e apresenta limitações em crianças de baixa idade e em pacientes anafiláticos. Assim, há necessidade de métodos diagnósticos alternativos, entre eles o estabelecimento de pontos de corte de concentrações de IgE sérica específica para leite de vaca, que permitam o diagnóstico mesmo sem a realização do TPODCPC. O objetivo deste estudo foi estabelecer uma concentração discriminante de IgE sérica específica para leite de vaca e suas frações protéicas para o diagnóstico de alergia à proteína do leite de vaca (APLV) e avaliar se há diferentes concentrações discriminantes de IgE específica para este alérgeno no grupo de pacientes com anafilaxia. Realizou-se um estudo de coorte histórica incluindo pacientes com APLV e grupo controle composto por pacientes com suspeita não confirmada de APLV. Para estes objetivos, foram construídas curvas ROC para os seguintes alérgenos: leite de vaca, caseína, a-lactoalbumina e b-lactoglobulina. Os níveis de IgE específica foram avaliados posteriormente, em separado, nos pacientes com anafilaxia. Foram incluídos 123 pacientes (1,3M:1F mediana = 1,91 anos, com idade de 3,5 meses a 13,21 anos) com diagnóstico confirmado de APLV através de TPODCPC (n=26), presença de anafilaxia à proteína do leite de vaca (n=46) ou história clínica fortemente sugestiva de APLV associada à pesquisa positiva de IgE específica através de teste cutâneo (n=51). Entre os 65 pacientes com anafilaxia, 19 confirmaram o diagnóstico posteriormente, através de testes de provocação. O grupo controle foi composto por 61 pacientes (1M:1,1F) com idade variando entre 0,66 e 16,7 anos (mediana= 6,83 anos). A metodologia adotada para estabelecimento dos pontos de corte...
Cow's milk proteins are the main allergens related to food allergy in children and the diagnosis include the double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Although this test presents accuracy, it involves risks, it is necessary special conditions and it presents limitations in infants and anaphylactic patients. It is necessary other diagnostic methods, among them the cut off values for IgE specific for milk to allow the cow's milk allergy (CMA) diagnosis without the need to perform the DBPCFC. The objective of this study was to establish a discriminating concentration of specific IgE to cow's milk and its proteins fractions for the diagnosis of allergy to CMA and to assess if there are different discriminating concentrations of specific IgE to this allergen in the group of patients with anaphylaxis. It was carried out a historical cohort study including patients with CMA and the control group was composed by patients with excluded CMA suspicion. To obtain the cutoff points for diagnosis of CMA , ROC curves were constructed for the following allergens: cow's milk, casein, a-lactalbumin and a b-lactoglobulin. The levels of specific IgE were later evaluated, separately, in patients with anaphylaxis. The study included 123 patients (1.3 M: 1F median = 1.91 years, ranging from 3.5 months to 13.21 years) with confirmed diagnosis of CMPA through DBPCFC (n = 26), the presence of anaphylaxis triggered by cow's milk protein (n = 46) or strongly suggestive clinical history associated with positive specific IgE through skin test (n = 51). Among the 65 patients with anaphylaxis, 19 confirmed the diagnosis through challenge tests. The control group was consisted of 61 patients (1M: 1.1 F) with ages ranging between 0.66 and 16.7 years (mean 6.86, median = 6.83 years). The methodology to stablish the cutoff was the construction of a ROC curve and subsequent calculation of positive and negative predictive value. The cutoff points obtained considering a 98%...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Breast-Milk Substitutes , Child , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E , Radioallergosorbent Test , Milk Hypersensitivity/diagnosisABSTRACT
We evaluated the correlations between the allergy skin test for house dust radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and the bronchial provocation test for revealing the sensitivity of the skin test and RAST, and for aiding in the search for the causative allergen in house dust asthmatics. There was an overall 72.5% agreement between the prick test and RAST, a 73.8% agreement between the prick test and house dust bronchoprovocation test (HD-BPT), and a 71.3% agreement between HD-BPT and RAST. A positive RAST was found with a positive HD-BPT in 71.2% of cases, and if RAST was negative, HD-BPT was negative in 46.9% of cases. 69.6% of the positive cases on prick test (more than 21 mm of erythema) were positive with RAST. All of the cases with a negative skin reaction to the prick test were negative to RAST. A positive skin test was found with a positive HD-BPT in 77.1% of cases, and if the prick test was negative, the HD-BPT was negative in 50.0% of cases. 87.5% of cases with a RAST positive exhibited a positive result with HD-BPT. A significant correlation was found between the results of prick tests and those of RASTs in the early response group of HD-BPT, but not in the late and dual response groups. There were significant correlations between total serum IgE and the results of HD-BPT, and total serum IgE value and the results of RAST. The greater the size of the prick test, the greater the likelihood of a positive HD-BPT. All 5 cases with an end point of intradermal skin test of a 5 degrees -5(-l) X 10(-2) dilution of house dust noted a negative HD-BPT. There was no significant correlation between total serum IgE and total eosinophil count. There was no significant correlation between wheal and erythema size of prick test and PC20 of methacholine.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Asthma/diagnosis , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Dust/adverse effects , Intradermal Tests , Middle Aged , Radioallergosorbent Test , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/diagnosisABSTRACT
In Korea, there are two descrite pollen seasons: a tree pollen season and a weed pollen season. In order to investigate the incidence of sensitization to the major pollens and to evaluate is clinical significance in respriatory allergic disease, skin prick tests were performed using 7 species of Korean pollen extracts (K-P extracts) and specific IgE was measured by the Phadebas radioallergosorbent test (RAST) in patients with positive skin prick tests. Of the 317 patients with respiratory allergic diseases 73 patients (23.0%) were skin prick test positive to one or more K-P extracts and the positive reactions to individual pollens were as follows: 14.2% (45/317) positive to sagebrush 10.4% to ragweed, 5.0% to grass, 4.1% to oak, 3.8% to alder, 1.9% to poplar; and 0% to pine. The 30-39yr old group manifested the highest skin test positivity 36.7%. There was no difference in the skin reactivity according to the patient's sex and the kinds of allergic disease. Also there was no relationship between birth season and skin test positivity. The agreement between the results of the skin prick test with K-P and commercially prepared Bencard's pollen extracts (B-P extracts) was good. There were good correlations between the strongly positive skin prick test and a posivite RAST and also between a netative skin prick test and a negative RAST. From this study, it can be concluded that overall sensitization rate of respiratory allergy patients to K-P exstracts was 23.0%, and that weed pollens such as sagebrush and ragweed were major pollens.